And to be charitable means that even if I regard the whole
affair as nonsensical, tone-deaf to the many other more important
issues of the day, I just have to give the main objects of my disgust
the benefit of the doubt. Yes, they deserve to be heard and given due
attention just the same, even if my initial impression was very
negative.
I remember that my immediate reaction to the interview was
to think that what this couple was complaining about or was bitching
about was nothing compared to what I hear almost daily about the
plight of many poor people who come to me for advice or at least for
some words of comfort, if not for some material help. I considered
their problem as petty.
That was already the first mistake. It was to compare the
problem of the prince and his wife with the problems of the others. In
that way, I already lost sight of the objective merits of the issue at
hand. The ensuing considerations would already be colored by that
bias.
It took me time before I realize that I had to restrain my
reactions, for the simple reason that in the first place I don’t
really know all the facts involved. And even if I knew a good deal of
them such that I can already form some judgments, it does not mean
that I can just be dismissive of them.
Charity demands that I try to understand them just as I have
to do the same to all the other parties involved, including the many
commentators who obviously made off-the-cuff and shooting-from-the-hip
comments. I should just look for solutions rather than spend most of
the time lamenting.
Most of the time, charity would require that we should just
keep quiet, and while trying to sort out things and find solutions, we
should just pray and offer sacrifices since these are the basic and
indispensable things to be done when problems arise. As much as
possible, we do not take sides.
Which does not mean that we are simply acting like
bystanders, indifferent to the problems around, and afraid to take
sides. It has to be made clear that we are actually taking a strong
side which is the side of charity. Charity transcends partisanship.
Charity has to deal with everyone without antagonizing anyone. Even
those who are in error should be treated kindly. Charity is for both
the winners and the losers.
This was the example of Christ who made it the new and
ultimate commandment that he gave us before he went up to heaven. We
have to learn to live charity especially when we engage ourselves in
some contentious issues, or sort out our unavoidable differences and
conflicts especially in the area of politics.
We have to be wary of what seems to be the mainstream world
culture today that limits charity to some works of mercy alone while
setting it aside when we do politics or when we discuss hot button
issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment