IN reaching out
to those who are still far from the
Church, those who are even hostile to it, those in the
peripheries,
etc., as we should, following the example and command of
Christ, a
most basic and commonsensical principle to follow is that
we avoid
using the same standards and criteria, the same protocols
that those
who are already very much in the Church follow.
It’s like in
the family where you have grown-up children
and a little child and a little baby. We treat them
differently. We
expect the little child and the little baby to make some
mess and we
would just clean it up, while giving them some training
appropriate to
their condition. Even among the grown-up children, you
can have those
who are healthy and sick, strong and weak, etc., and we
treat them
according to how they are.
There obviously
are common things that have to be observed
by all, and these are what we call the essentials. In the
end, the
ultimate essential is love, the love that comes from God,
a love that
can adapt itself to any situation, because as St. Paul
said in his
Letter to the Romans, “love is the fulfillment of the
law.” (13,10)
The other
things, like the protocols about how to pray,
how to make sacrifice, how to attend Mass, etc., can be
waived if the
conditions warrant and even require it. We have to be
discerning and
prudent in applying the protocols to different kinds of
people.
We have to
contend with a great variety of differences
among the people, and we should just have to learn to
deal with that
reality. Among the most obvious things that we need to do
is to have
constant monitoring of these differences and constantly
studying as
well how these differences can be handled accordingly.
The differences
can come in terms of age, culture,
profession, social and economic status, intelligence
level,
temperament, ideology, political preference, etc. It’s
about time that
these differences are closely monitored and regularly
inventoried,
with appropriate plans and strategies of how to deal with
them
properly.
We cannot and
should not absolutize what only has relative
value. And vice-versa, of course. We should not
relativize what has
absolute and permanent value, no matter what the
conditions and
situations on the ground are.
As already said
many times, what is of absolute value,
what is truly and ultimately essential, what is
non-negotiable, is
love, a love that comes from Christ. And if we look at
how Christ
showed and lived out that love, we can say that he did
away with many
of the legalisms and human traditions of the elders at
that time to
reach out to those who were the lost sheep, the lost coin
and the
prodigal son.
Imagine what he
did to show this love. Being God, he
became man. His first 30 years of hidden life were spent
just like how
everybody else spent their time—working and doing the
usual duties.
Even in his public life, he led a simple and austere life
despite the
preaching and the wonderful miracles that he performed.
In the end, he
allowed himself to suffer all kinds of
indignities all the way to being crucified just to assume
all our sins
and reopen the gates of heaven for all of us. St. Paul
said that he
was made like sin without committing sin just to save us.
(cfr. 2 Cor
5,21)
It’s love more
than merely following some laws, customs
and traditional practices that matters. He, of course,
subjected
himself to these laws and traditions, but when the
demands of love
transcend the scope of these laws and traditions, he
simply did what
he had to do out of love, even if he ended misunderstood,
persecuted
and ultimately executed.
This example of
love of Christ is what we have to follow
when we try to obey his command that we love one another
as he himself
has loved us.
No comments:
Post a Comment