WE have to be familiar with the
so-called pro-choice
position that is now becoming the
prevalent ideology affecting many
countries and especially the young ones,
the so-called millennials. We
need to be familiar with it so that we
can be better prepared to deal
with it, since it is now invading our
own country. In fact, there is
now a strong foreign-funded pressure to
instil this kind of liberal
pro-choice view on us.
The pro-choice position, of course,
refers to the
so-called life-issues, like abortion,
population control, same-sex
marriage, divorce, euthanasia, etc. It
has an eminently moral question
that we need to be clear about.
We need to understand that there
are moral principles that
derive from the very nature of things,
and especially of our own. And
they have a universal applicability,
going beyond our natural and
artificial differences in race, culture,
religion and other
categories.
In a nutshell, the pro-choice
position can be expressed in
the following words as expressed by many
of its advocates and
followers: “I am pro-choice, even if
that means abortion. I am also
for same-sex unions, and I also support
legalizing divorce. What
people want to do with their lives and
their body should not be
controlled by other people’s religious
beliefs.
“If you do not want abortion, don’t
get one. If you don’t
want to marry one of the same sex, by
all means, don’t. Don’t divorce
if that’s what you prefer. But to take
away other people’s choices
because you don’t agree with them is
evil and wrong. The terrible
thing is that many people can only
imagine a world where their
religion is absolute. What tyranny!”
It’s incredible that this view can
be held even by very
educated people, and people who are even
products of Catholic schools
and other very prestigious centers of
learning.
At least two possibilities can
explain this disturbing
phenomenon. One is that these schools
are not anymore teaching morals
and are just focusing on technical
things. And two, that the students
may be taught morals but are not
internalizing them. Of course, there
are still many other possible
explanations.
With this pro-choice position, one
is practically saying
that there are no absolute moral
principles with a universal
applicability, that everyone is
absolutely free to do whatever he
wants to do. In other words, one makes
himself his own lawgiver, if
not his own god. He cannot be told and
taught anything. He has to be
left alone. He can do anything he likes.
It is amazing that many people with
this position do not
realize that they are going against even
the very basics of common
sense. We are never alone. We can never
be alone. We have to live by
certain laws. We cannot escape the fact
that we have to submit to
certain do’s and don’ts.
Abortion is not about exercising
the right over a woman’s
body. Whether one is a believer or not,
abortion is simply killing a
human person. A fetus inside the
mother’s womb is not just a clump of
cells. A fetus just cannot be but a
baby.
And the so-called same-sex marriage
is a contradiction
since marriage can only be between a man
and woman. It is not meant
only for good-time, for giving in to
what our flesh desires. It is
meant for procreation, for education and
upbringing of children and
family, and the good of society.
Divorce simply goes against the
very nature of marriage.
It is rejecting one’s commitment of love
however the marriage may go.
The concerned parties in marriage
promise “to have and to hold, from
this day forward, for better, for worse,
for richer, for poorer, in
sickness and in health, until death do
us part”
Let’s hope that families, churches,
schools, offices and
the government units help in clarifying
these moral life issues both
with clarity and charity always. Hardly
anything is gained when we
start fighting.
No comments:
Post a Comment