WE have to play
it cool when we discuss matters of
opinion. These, in the first place, are views that are
hardly based on
absolute truths of faith and dogmas. They are more
expressions of
one’s preferences and tastes, and therefore we should
expect a wide
spectrum of differences, since things depend on people’s
different
temperaments, backgrounds, cultures, etc.
Yes, we can
have some exchanges and try to sort out these
different and even conflicting opinions if only to
clarify things and
perhaps to eke out a most fair view with respect to a
particular
issue. We can attempt to have a kind of consensus.
But all these
should be done in an atmosphere of mutual
respect and utmost charity and delicacy. We have to avoid
bitter zeal,
sarcasm, irony, insults, ad hominems, mockery, vulgarity,
nitpicking,
fault-finding, one-upmanship, the crab mentality and the
like.
In our
discussions, let’s see to it that we try our best
to see and understand why the others have views that are
different and
even conflicting to ours. We have to know where they are
coming from.
Let’s be
conscious of the most subtle trick to impose our
opinions on others by asking questions or clarifying
based only on our
biases and preferences. I must say that in this regard,
many people
fail to realize. This usually happens in the area of
political issues.
And that’s why,
very often the discussion turns into
wrangling, bashing and slamming. It becomes ugly and
unproductive. We
have to learn the art of agreeing to disagree, and manage
to leave the
hot discussion as friends and gentlemen. In this way, we
can maintain
a certain unity among ourselves despite the wide
diversity.
Even in matters
of faith and dogma where our core and most
sacred beliefs are involved, we should not impose
ourselves on others.
We can proclaim our beliefs and we can do it as
forcefully as
possible, but still always in the context of charity.
We have to
follow what St. Paul once said—that we have to
speak the truth in charity so that “we will in all things
grow up into
Christ himself, who is the head of the body, the Church.”
(Eph 4,15)
In the end, to be like Christ, “alter Christus,” if not
“ipse
Christus,” is our ultimate goal.
And if we look
closely at the example of Christ, he was
always open to anything even as he proclaimed the truth
which is not
anymore a matter of opinion. He showed utmost fidelity to
his mission
without twisting people’s arms, much less, spewing
threats.
In the end, he
accepted death which can only mean that he
bore all the sins, mistakes, faults, and all the other
negatives of
men. He offered not only understanding but also
forgiveness.
We have to
learn how to be sport and cool in our exchanges
of opinions. We need to rein in our emotions and have a
clear vision
of the ideal that we have to live in these discussions.
Charity should
always prevail, because the truth, justice and all the
other values we
are interested in would lose their essence if charity is
absent.
And charity
here can only come from the charity of God as
revealed to us and lived fully by Christ.
No comments:
Post a Comment