CHRIST himself
said so. “You always have the poor with
you, but you will not always have me.” (Mt 26,11) In
other words, we
will always have the poor because in the end we all are
the poor. We
are all in need of God. That’s what makes us all poor and
hopefully
struggling to attend to that most important need.
That said, we
cannot deny the obvious fact that according
to some human standards and criteria, we have some people
who are
considered poor and others considered rich. This
distinction should
not be lost in our mind and should trigger in us the
desire to do what
is appropriate.
Thus, we have
to understand very well the true meaning of
the slogan often mouthed by many people today that we
should give
“preferential option to the poor.” This policy or
pastoral thrust
which, doubtless, is very sublime, should not deteriorate
into some
unnecessary and dangerous social division and conflict
among
ourselves.
Despite our
differences, we have to care for one another.
We should be responsible for one another. We have to give
what
everyone needs out of justice and charity, without
getting lost in the
priorities proper to us. That’s because, in the end, we
are all
brothers and sisters, all children of God!
Our differences
should rather trigger the dynamics of
greater love and unity, not of division. They should
invite and
encourage us to be more understanding and compassionate
with one
another the way Christ was understanding and
compassionate with
everyone.
Our common,
universal and absolute need is God, and we
just have to learn how to give or show God to one
another. All our
other needs—material, economic, health, etc.—are
secondary to this and
should serve as occasions and instruments to meet our
need for God.
We have to be
very wary of certain ideologies that water
down our need for God, or at least distort it, by getting
entangled in
their priorities, giving exaggerated attention to the
material aspects
of our life at the expense of our spiritual and
supernatural goals.
The material
and economic aspects are definitely
important, but it would be wrong to pursue them as the
ultimate need
for man. Detached from its objective relation to God, the
Creator,
these aspects have no other way but to get into trouble.
Not that by
making God the ultimate need, there will be
less concern for the material, economic and other human
needs we have.
Quite the contrary. Our concern for them would in fact be
enhanced.
We have to be
wary of certain currents of thought that,
no matter how subtly done, tend to put into conflict our
material and
natural needs with our spiritual and supernatural needs.
We somehow
should follow the example of Mary, that woman
who brought the precious ointment to Christ, in the sense
of giving
Christ the best that we have, whether material, moral or
spiritual.
That would show
how much we love him. And by loving him,
we would know how to love the others properly, a love
that can go all
the way, without being afraid of any sacrifices involved.
No comments:
Post a Comment