ASIDE from
being able to distinguish between what is
clearly good and what is clearly bad, we need to learn to
distinguish
the different levels and nuances of what is good, since
we have to
choose the right good at the right moment or situation.
Not everything
that is good in itself is the good thing to be, have or
do in a given
situation.
In this regard,
two aphorisms can illustrate this point
where the good and the best can, in fact, clash. One is,
“The good is
the enemy of the best.” And the other is, “The best is
the enemy of
the good.” And we have to know when each is applicable.
That “the good
is the enemy of the best” simply means that
one is contented with settling for things that are merely
good or
adequate while preventing him from achieving that which
is ideal.
In the gospel,
this phenomenon is illustrated in that
parable where Christ spoke about the kingdom of heaven
being like
treasure hidden in a field and about a merchant looking
for fine
pearls. (cfr. Mt 13,44-46)
When a man
found the treasure hidden in the field, he hid
it again, and then in his joy went and sold all he had
and bought that
field. Also, when the merchant found a pearl of great
value, he went
away and sold everything he had in order to buy that
pearl.
This attitude
of settling only with what is passable or
adequate and not striving to have the ideal or the best
is a
manifestation of certain spiritual lukewarmness or of a
spirituality
that is stuck in mediocrity. The fervor of love is
missing. The
creativeness and inventiveness of love is absent. It’s an
attitude
that can expose a conscience that is lax.
Sad to say,
many people fall for this kind of attitude and
lifestyle. We need to find a way of rousing them from
their state of
lethargy and self-contentment, and of motivating them to
get out of
their comfort zone if they truly know that they can do
more. If they
have the proper spirit and is truly burning with love,
they would be
willing to leave behind what is already good in order to
pursue what
is better, if not the best.
The other
aphorism, “the best is the enemy of the good,”
simply means that one is obsessed with what he considers
to be
perfection. In other words, he is afflicted with the
anomaly called
perfectionism. It’s an attitude that can spring from a
scrupulous
conscience.
Variations of
this aphorism are Confucius’ “Better a
diamond with a flaw than a pebble without.” Or
Shakespeare’s “Striving
to better, oft we mar what’s well.” An example of this
attitude is
when a student is so obsessed in making an excellent
research that he
fails to submit his work on time.
In the gospel,
this phenomenon is exemplified when Christ
said that it would be better to have one eye, or one hand
or one arm
and enter heaven than to have both of these faculties but
go to hell.
(cfr. Mt 18,8-9)
It’s a call to
be contented with what is already adequate
or to make do or put up with something that is already
bearable if the
ideal condition cannot be achieved. It’s a call to be
realistic and
practical.
Obviously, for
us to know which case is appropriate in a
given situation, we need to refer ourselves to God in our
conscience.
It’s true that we have to aim at what is the best, but if
for some
reason the best condition cannot be achieved, we have to
be contented
with what we have or what is doable or achievable, even
if it is not
the ideal.
Usually when we
refer things to God, some peace of mind
and a sense of confidence would be felt.
No comments:
Post a Comment