Sunday, November 3, 2019

Collaborate, coordinate, interact, etc.


IN any social environment where we always find ourselves, be
it the family, school, office, parish, or society in general, etc., we
have to remember three basic and indispensable principles that should
guide our actuations there. These are the principles of the common
good, solidarity and subsidiarity.
  
          The definitions of these principles are found in the
Catechism and in many other sources, but for now I would like to focus
on the principle of solidarity. This is the constant awareness that we
are supposed to be always working together, journeying together toward
our common destination which is the common good, both the temporal and
the eternal common good.
   
          As such, we need to be aware of our duty to always
collaborate with others, coordinating and interacting with them, while
doing the task that is specific to each one of us, so that the common
good can be achieved.
  
          We can describe this need as our need for teamwork always,
knowing that we are never working alone, and that even in our most
personal and hidden work, we should be aware that we are still working
with others. We should always have the others and their tasks in mind,
so that we can work as a team to attain our common good.
  
          What we have to avoid is simply to do our tasks without
thinking of how our tasks can go in tandem with those of the others so
that the common goal can be achieved. We have to avoid having an
individualistic and isolationist outlook in life. We need to reach out
to others in an ever widening circle of concern, from the mainstream
to the peripheries, always looking for new frontiers.
  
          We are and should be interested in progress, growth and
development in all aspects of our life that in the end should lead us
to our final and eternal common good who is God. Thus, everything
should be done to achieve this goal.
  
          For example, we can establish working linkages with the
others or the other sectors involved in a specific social environment.
This way, we can have a running monitoring of developments in that
social environment, giving us ideas of how our duties and
responsibilities can synergize with those of the others.
  
          Yes, we have to broaden our outlook and develop the
pertinent social skills to facilitate this need for solidarity. With
all the powerful technical means of communication we now have, meeting
this need should be greatly facilitated. It should be no problem. We
should just have the proper attitude and skills.
  
          It is perhaps with this concern in mind that Pope Francis
seems to be promoting recently the idea of synodality. It is the
effort to come up with synods, a gathering of bishops and other people
who are experts in certain fields, to discuss about a specific issue
or concern with the view of establishing a functional linkage with the
people involved in that issue or concern.
  
          At the moment, the Pope has called a Synod on the Amazon, a
big region in Latin America where the Church presence and her
missionary work has not reached a stable status. The issues involved
in that synod are broad and complicated, and it is understandable that
some controversies are stirred there. But the idea of synodality, I
believe, should be fostered.
  
          We should train everyone as early as possible about this
need, this duty and responsibility for solidarity. We have to be wary
of the tendency for people to isolate themselves from the others,
concerned only about their own personal interest with nary any
interest for solidarity and the common good.
  
          How ironic it is that with all the powerful communication
means we have now, many people are getting more individualistic rather
than being more collaborative with others. There seems to be
replication of the building of the Tower of Babel and walls instead of
doors and bridges.


Saturday, November 2, 2019

Benefits from crises

THIS has always been the lesson learned many times in the
past. Whatever controversy and crisis assailing the Church somehow
leads it to the purification of its human elements and the
clarification of certain issues. There can be no problem so big as to
destroy or weaken it. It is assured of the guarantee of Christ who
said that “the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.”(Mt 16,18)
  
            What we have to do when controversies and crises of one
sort or another erupt is to pray a lot, offer a lot of sacrifices,
have recourse to the sacraments, and then study the issues well, come
up with some plans and strategies to see how to practically handle
these problems.
  
            Yes, we have to use all the spiritual and supernatural
means available, without sparing the human means. But we should always
remain calm and confident, never giving in to passion, anger,
bitterness and the like that would only make things worse. We can
still be forceful and clear without getting too emotional in going
through these controversies.
  
            No doubt, there will be suffering involved, and sometimes
it can be very severe. We just have to be prepared for this
unavoidable thing. As long as we remain faithful to God, doing our
best to be close and intimate with him, we know, as St. Paul assured
us, that everything will work out for the good. (cfr. Rom 8,28)
  
            We have to learn to be very patient and optimistic,
because things can take a lot of time before they can be properly
resolved. And we should see to it that we never loosen our grip on
charity, especially with those who we are quite sure are in error. We
should be quick to forgive and to remove any trace of resentments and
grudges as we try to sort out things.
  
            Christ never abandons us nor his Church, but he will
neither prevent us from suffering because that is the way we can
attain our salvation, given our wounded condition. Let’s just be game
about this earthly setting of ours, and try our best to be quick to
unite whatever suffering we experience with the suffering of Christ so
that ours can attain a redemptive value.
  
            Let’s take comfort in the many examples found in the Bible
of how God can derive good from evil. This is how the Catechism (312)
puts it:
  
            “In time we can discover that God in his almighty
providence can bring a good from the consequences of an evil, even a
moral evil, caused by his creature: ‘It was not you,’ said Joseph to
his brother, ‘who sent me here, but God…You meant evil against me, but
God meant it for good, to bring it about that many people should be
kept alive.’
  
            “From the greatest moral evil ever committed—the rejection
and murder of God’s only Son, caused by the sins of all men—God, by
his grace that ‘abounded all the more,’ brought the greatest of goods:
the glorification of Christ and our redemption. But for all that, evil
never becomes a good.”
   
            In our discussions and exchanges of views, let us see to
it that we all remain courteous to everyone, even if we feel we are
already talking to the devil. That’s because losing that element of
charity would resemble us more with the devil than with God. Yes, we
can speak our mind as much as we can, but always with charity.
  
            We have to be very careful in this regard. If we review
the episode of the temptation of Christ by the devil, Christ treated
the devil kindly even if he was strong and clear about the temptation.
  
            In fact, Christ gave harsher treatment to the
self-righteous scribes and Pharisees, and even called Peter ‘Satan’
when Peter tried to dissuade him from going to Jerusalem to meet his
final act of redeeming us.


Friday, November 1, 2019

A commitment is not a straitjacket


FAR from straitjacketing or stereotyping us, entering into a
commitment would simply show that we are so driven with love and a
deep sense of freedom that we are willing to take on whatever
consequences our commitment would make on us.
   
          We are human with a soul that is spiritual but with a body
that is material. While our spiritual self orients us to the infinite
and to an endless range of possibilities, our material self puts us
under so many conditions and specifications. In a sense, a commitment
concretizes the spiritual in us.
  
          We have to learn how to blend these two fundamental
qualities of our being, because we can neither be purely spiritual nor
purely material. We have to be both. Our spiritual self needs to be
materialized, while our material self needs to be spiritualized.
   
          And entering into a commitment simply puts the spiritual and
infinity-oriented character of our love and freedom into the material
conditions and specifications of our life. A commitment is our love
and freedom expressed in a concrete and specific way. It makes our
love and freedom avoid being fuzzy. Rather, it makes them clear.
  
          While a commitment has its costs, requirements and
obligations, we would be willing to meet and assume them precisely
because of love and our sense of freedom. A commitment shows our level
of maturity. When we enter into a commitment, we know what we are
giving up in order to gain something much better than what we give up.
   
          A commitment reflects what Christ once said about a certain
detachment that is necessary to be with him. “If anyone comes to me
and does not hate his father and mother and wife and children and
brothers and sisters—yes, even his own life—he cannot be my disciple,”
he said. (Lk 14,26)
  
          We have to understand what Christ really meant by “hate”
here. To be sure, it does not mean that we hate anyone in the usual
way we understand the word “hate.” Let’s remember that we are
commanded to love everyone, including the enemies.
  
          Rather to “hate” here means to be detached from anyone, no
matter how close he is to us, who can sort of compete with our love
for God. Nothing and no one should stand in the way of our love for
God, knowing that by loving God fully, we also would know how to love
everybody else properly.
  
          A commitment will always involve some sacrifices, some
giving up. This happens when a man marries a woman. He marries her
because he loves her, but when he already marries her, he is committed
to love her till death, with a love that, since it involves the body,
is exclusive.
  
          By marrying he knows that he has to raise a family, and
therefore should be ready to take on the pertinent responsibilities
that will require a lot of sacrifice.
  
          The same when a man enters the priesthood. He submits
himself to the requirements of celibacy, poverty and obedience, making
himself as available as he can to the assignments given him by his
bishop and the spiritual needs of the people.
  
          A man with a good sense of commitment knows that even if he
has a concrete way of doing things, he is not envious of how others
are with their own way of doing things. Neither does he feel superior
or inferior to them because of their different lifestyle.
  
          A commitment to a vocation provides one with a specific path
to reach his ultimate goal, which is to be with God in heaven. One
knows that his commitment to a vocation is one path among many others
that can bring us to heaven. We just have to respect each other and
try to figure out how we can mutually help each other.