Monday, April 11, 2016

Amoris laetitia

THAT’S “The joy of love” in English, the title of the
latest papal document. It summarizes and integrates all the
observations, findings and conclusions of the two Synods of Bishops on
the family that took place in 2014 and 2015.

            More than that, it outlines the papal thrust, and
therefore that of the whole Church, on how the pastoral care of the
family should be done today. It strikes me as a bold step forward in
keeping pace with the current state of family issues, complex and
complicated as they are now.

            In a nutshell, what it teaches and proposes is to uphold
traditional Catholic teaching on marriage and family and also to
encourage a new sensitivity, a new dynamism in dealing with the
different pertinent issues.

            This document has to be read and studied slowly, because
the new things and approaches presented in this document can always
create some stir in the minds and hearts of some people who are
understandably attached to the traditional ways of doing things.

            It’s just unfortunate that some groups have immediately
taken the occasion to find fault in the document. They have even gone
to the extent of saying that Catholics cannot follow some points
articulated in the document. Indulging in speculations driven by fear,
they dabble in many legalistic and moralistic hair-splittings. Ok,
they also need to be heard.

            But I find that development disrespectful of the papal
office at the least. Any question or complaint they want to raise
should, to my mind, be lodged first with the proper office in the
Church rather than immediately going public and sowing confusion and
distress on the people.

            But then again, this development is not surprising at all,
because even in the time of Christ, many self-righteous people were
always finding fault in his ways of dealing with people who were
considered as sinners. Just the same, Christ finally submitted to
their schemes, offering his life on the cross, and asked for
forgiveness for them.

            I believe the problem is how to see the link between God’s
abundant and gratuitous love for mankind that is based always on the
truth as fully revealed by Christ, on the one hand, and God’s equally
abundant and gratuitous mercy for mankind that is also based on the
truth as fully revealed and lived by Christ himself, on the other
hand.

            Many people fail to see this organic shift from divine
love to divine mercy. They fail to see that the love that is at the
core of the very being of God is translated into mercy when extended
to his creatures, especially to us who, of all the creatures, are his
masterpiece since we have been created in his image and likeness.

            It cannot be any other way. Creatures as we are, we cannot
replicate to the full the very love God has within himself, no matter
how best we try. We can only approximate it. And it is God’s mercy
that can fill up what will always be lacking and missing in our love.

            This is not to say that we can flout any of the moral
teachings that the Church has so far developed through the ages, based
on the teachings and example of Christ himself. It is rather to make
some progress in our moral sense by giving more attention to divine
mercy as taught and shown by Christ that appears to be ignored up to
now.

            Christ readily forgave the Samaritan woman with 6
husbands, the woman caught in adultery, the thief who was crucified
with him. When he performed miracles, it was not so much to heal those
involved of their illness as to forgive them of their sins.

            When Christ issued the new commandment of loving one
another as he has loved us, I suppose that we have to be as merciful
as Christ has been with everyone, even going all the way to accepting
the cross, dying on it, and asking for forgiveness for everyone.
That’s the reason why we have to learn to suffer, because suffering
will be unavoidable if we truly have to follow Christ.

            I suppose we need to identify ourselves more and more with
Christ as we try to follow all the moral teachings of the Church. That
should be the sensation we feel as we go through studying all the
moral doctrine of our Christian faith. We should avoid reducing
Christian perfection into some intellectualism alone. It should lead
to a vital identification with Christ.

            This way we would be more able to do what the document is
suggesting—that we do effective accompaniment and discernment in our
relation with everyone.

No comments: