OUR laws should not be left alone to dry up and deteriorate into a dead letter.
We need to give them life always and revive them from time to time when they
show signs of flagging. They need to be nourished, purified, attuned and
adapted to situations as they flow in time.
I wonder if we, as a people, as a nation, are aware of this responsibility. We
make laws, usually worded very beautifully with all the legal jargon we can get
from all sources, but then we scarcely make any effort to enforce them, much
less, to make them grow and flow with the times.
We have to remember that our laws are at best our estimation of what is truly
good and fair for us. They can’t help but be reflections of the ultimate law,
which is the eternal law of God, our creator.
Unless we understand that, we would be suffering from a fundamental infirmity,
if not a radical error, that would surely drift us to all kinds of dangerous
destinations in life. Yes, they are mere estimations, which presume that they
are supposed to be a living, dynamic phenomenon that needs to be handled
accordingly. They are estimations in constant search for perfection.
Thus, they always need refinement and polishing. They are a letter that
constantly requires to be animated by the spirit proper of us as persons and
children of God. Our laws cannot just be a matter of words. They have to have
the spirit, otherwise, they would denature themselves.
And their perfection is nothing less than love, just like what one liturgical
prayer puts it: “Law finds its fulfillment in love.” Of course, love here means
everything: truth, justice, affection, understanding, sacrifice, patience, etc.
We have to have a very clear idea of what this love is all about, because all
sorts of definitions that spring mainly from the emotions, fashions, and very
partial ideologies, are now being presented to us and we need to be discerning.
Our laws should become more and more humane, more and more able to bring us to
God as well as to serve the common good.
Thing is if we individually make some kind of periodic self-assessment or
examination of conscience to see if we are still on the right track, to see if
what we are now approaches what we ought to be, then all the more reason should
we as collective body, as a people and nation, need to have the same regular
self-examination.
Business companies, for example, take pains to take care of their bookkeeping,
lest they would fail in their business. They institute all sorts of
check-and-balance mechanisms just to see to it that things are working as they
should.
But do we do this? Frankly, I don’t see much of these things around. If ever
there are signs, they remain signs with hardly any substance to back them up.
They are just for show.
We need to have a radical conversion to attend to this basic need of
self-examination. This obviously should start in the individual level, but it
should spread to an ever-widening circle of entities—family, schools, offices,
communities, towns, cities, provinces, private and public sectors, and other
areas of human concerns.
This need should be able to count on an adequate plan of practices and
structures in all levels of human life, seeing to it also that the coordination
among the different parts and levels is well delineated and executed.
Are we able to pinpoint the gaping loopholes that exist, for example, in the
area of how our public officials are using the public funds or approving
contracts or identifying projects to be done?
Are we growing toward a greater and more effective participation of the constituents
in making decisions that affect a certain community? How are we improving our
electoral process such that the true common good of the people is served and
not perverted by certain machinations of politicians?
There many other questions that can be asked, and they all show that we have to
be always watchful with regard to our public affairs, and the appropriate laws
should be made and improved to effectively pursue the ideal situation for us as
a people.
The problem is that our politicians in general are distracted by their desire
to remain in power or to get even more of it. So we have lawmakers who, instead
of making laws, more busy going around practically campaigning.
We need to have living laws, that dead ones.
No comments:
Post a Comment